Sunday, October 30, 2011
SORTING THINGS OUT
(Introducing Elihu)
Job 32:1-33:7
Tina and Sarah have been friends for over ten years. They enjoy some of the same activities and have similar backgrounds. But recently they had a falling out. Tina can’t stand the fact that there is a problem between them. Each has her own interpretation of what happened and whose fault it is. The whole thing involves a number of other people and seems quite complicated. Finally, Tina calls Sarah, who answers her call for the first time since the problem arose. The conversation goes something like this…
“Sarah, can we just get together, talk this over, and get things straightened out?”
“I’m not sure we can work things out, Tina.”
“Please, let’s just sit down and give it a try. I miss you.” After a long pause, Sarah responds:
“Tina, part of me wants to do that, but I just don’t know. I feel like I need to kind of sort things out before I decide what to do.”
This morning it is time to pause and sort some things out. This is not just my preference, but the idea actually comes from the book of Job. We have come to chapter 32. Chapter 31 ended like this: “The words of Job are ended.” In chapter 32 we are introduced to a brand new character, a man whose name has not been mentioned until now. After wading through the debates of chapters 4-31, we might have concluded that there isn’t any room for a new character. Nevertheless, a man named Elihu comes on the scene in the second verse of chapter 32. He will speak for six chapters, without interruption.
By the way, as we begin to read chapter 32, it soon becomes obvious that Elihu has been present during this entire debate between Job and his friends. Up until now, we might just assume that it was just the four of them, but now we find out differently. Since Elihu was present, there may have been others. Whether there was one or twenty, we know that the debaters at least had Elihu as an observer.
There is another reason that pleads for us to sort things out. It is simply the words of the first five verses of chapter 32. Let’s go ahead and read Job 32:1-5…
So these three men ceased answering Job, because he was righteous in his own eyes. 2 Then the wrath of Elihu, the son of Barachel the Buzite, of the family of Ram, was aroused against Job; his wrath was aroused because he justified himself rather than God. 3 Also against his three friends his wrath was aroused, because they had found no answer, and yet had condemned Job. 4 Now because they were years older than he, Elihu had waited to speak to Job. 5 When Elihu saw that there was no answer in the mouth of these three men, his wrath was aroused.
What do we make out of this statement “because Job was righteous in his own eyes”? Had not God Himself said that Job was righteous? What does this mean? And who is this Elihu? What stake does he have in this discussion? And why was he so angry? After all, the word “wrath” (“anger” in some of the other translations) is used four times in verse 2-5. We are told that Elihu waited to speak because he was younger than the other men, but should he have spoken at all. Have not the two sides been presented? Do we need a third? And what about his charge that Job justified himself rather than God?
Perhaps it’s time to sort some things out. If you like titles for sermons, you could entitle this one “Sorting Things Out” or “Introducing Elihu.”
At this point, we are going to be forced to come to some conclusions, and these conclusions will influence the way we see the entire book of Job. I do not demand that you agree with my conclusions, but consider them as we continue to ask the Lord to give us understanding. I must tell you that there are different interpretations of the issues we are going to discuss. Let’s set two of the primary issues on the table before we proceed any further. First, we must determine how to interpret the words of verse 1, “Because he was righteous in his own eyes.” The second key question is simply this: “How will we view Elihu?” Is he an arrogant young brat who has nothing to add? Or, does he speak wisdom that helps make sense of the book of Job? Again, opinions are widely varied among competent Bible students. Nevertheless, let us dive in with reverence, as we ask for the Lord’s wisdom.
I. Job Was Righteous in His Own Eyes
Chapter 32 begins with a bang: “So these three men ceased answering Job, because he was righteous in his own eyes.” We know who the three men are -- Eliphaz the Elegant, Bildad the Brutal, and Zophar the Zealous (as one author -- Ray Stedman -- nicknames them). We will hear no more words from them, though they will appear again in the last chapter of the book. As we mentioned before, they kind of tailed off, with Bildad speaking only six verses in the last round of the debate and Zophar saying nothing at all.
Identifying the three men is the easy part, but unraveling the rest of the sentence isn’t so easy. Some take it to mean that Eliphaz, Bildad, and Zophar ceased to answer Job because they believed that Job was righteous in his own eyes. That is one way to view the statement. That would not necessarily mean that Job considered himself righteous, but only that his three friends thought he considered himself righteous. If that is the case, it is because Job would not admit that he had committed some terrible sin, such as oppressing the poor and needy, of which he was accused by Eliphaz. On the other hand, this may be the statement of the author of the book, who is simply telling us that Job viewed himself as righteous. If so, it would seem that the three friends had good reason to cease answering Job.
Regardless of which way we take it, the question remains: Was Job righteous in his own eyes? Did he consider himself righteous? And if he did, what exactly does “righteous” mean? And on top of that, would there be anything wrong with Job considering himself to be righteous, since God Himself declared Job to be righteous. Let’s try to get a handle on this issue, as we think carefully and prayerfully together.
Let’s begin by asking this: Was Job a righteous man? Absolutely. The author of Job says in the very first verse (1:1), “There was a man in the land of Uz, whose name was Job; and that man was blameless and upright, and one who feared God and shunned evil.” In both 1:8 and 2:3 God tells Satan the same thing about Job: "Have you considered My servant Job, that there is none like him on the earth, a blameless and upright man, one who fears God and shuns evil?" Yes, Job was a righteous man. However, that does not mean he was a perfectly sinless man. Job has made it clear that he has committed sins (see 13:23; 14:17), though not the ones of which his friends have accused him. Though Job stood out above other men so much so that God chose him as His test case in dealing with Satan, still he was not perfect in the sense that he never sinned.
What do you think of when you hear the phrase “righteous in his own eyes”? At the heart of it is pride. This describes a man who has become puffed up with pride. Was this true of Job? But how could anyone truthfully say that about a man whom God has declared righteous? That brings us to another issue. Could Job have changed since chapter 2? We know that at the end of chapter 1 he was doing well. In spite of losing his possessions and even his children, he could still worship the Lord and say, “Naked came I out of my mother's womb, and naked shall I return thither: the LORD gave, and the LORD hath taken away; blessed be the name of the LORD” (Job 1:21). The Lord’s verdict at that time is recorded in the next verse: “In all this Job sinned not, nor charged God foolishly” (1:22). After that, his own wife urged him to curse God and die (2:9). Then we read in the next verse, “But he said unto her, Thou speakest as one of the foolish women speaketh. What? shall we receive good at the hand of God, and shall we not receive evil? In all this did not Job sin with his lips” (2:10).
Yes, Job endured the early attacks of Satan well. There is no question about that. We applaud him. But is it possible that there has been a subtle change in the ensuing months and during the exchanges of chapters 3-31? We cannot answer that question adequately without taking a peek at chapter 42. After God addressed Job in chapters 38-41, Job gives a brief response at the beginning of chapter 42. Later we will examine that response in detail, but right now let’s read 42:6, "Wherefore I abhor myself, and repent in dust and ashes." With deep humility and sorrow, Job repented. Of what did he repent? There is no evidence that he is admitting that he was guilty of the charges of his three friends. Surely he is not finally confessing that he had some deep hidden sin, such as oppressing the poor and needy. If that had been the case, God would not have rebuked his three friends. So why did he repent? This suggests that there was indeed a change somewhere after the end of chapter 2.
Now we come back to the statement that Job was righteous in his own eyes. Does it not make perfect sense that this was the sin for which Job repented? Though a righteous man, through his great ordeal of suffering, pride had surfaced in Job. You say, “Is it possible for a man who has been pronounced righteous to become proud?” Pride is no respecter of persons. Every human being on the face of the earth is vulnerable to pride, and that includes those who have been justified by the blood of Jesus Christ. We never get beyond the temptation to be proud. Never. The moment we think we are not capable of becoming proud we reveal that we are already proud. As we look at the words of Elihu in these chapters, watch for evidence that Job has become proud.
III. Elihu Declares both Job and His Friends to Be Wrong
Elihu not only has something to say about Job, but he also has an opinion about Job’s friends. We will come back to the end of verse 2 in a few minutes, but first let’s look at verse 3. “Also against his three friends his wrath was aroused, because they found no answer, and yet had condemned Job.” Elihu felt he had good reason to be angry with Elihu, Bildad, and Zophar. These men had condemned Job, but they had no good reason to do so. Elihu is openly stating his belief that their charges against Job were unfounded. They aimed their long speeches at Job, as an attacker would aim his arrows. In short, they attacked Job time after time and laid him in the dust. Now Elihu brings his accusation: “You condemned Job, but you didn’t correct him. Job gave his rebuttal to your charges, and you found no answer. Nevertheless, you continued to accuse him and condemn him.”
All through this debate we have noted the fact that Elihu, Bildad, and Zophar said many things that were absolutely true. One of the clearest examples comes from the first speech of Eliphaz. 5:17, "Behold, happy is the man whom God corrects; Therefore do not despise the chastening of the Almighty.” We can find the same truth in Proverbs 3, even stated in the same words. However, when we read the rest of the chapter, we find out what Eliphaz is up to. He is implying strongly that Job’s great suffering is God’s correction for some terrible sin he has committed. As we read chapter after chapter, this intent becomes more and more evident. It seems that Job’s three friends are not really listening to Job; they are simply getting themselves ready for the next verbal attack.
This is why Elihu is angry with them. He can see that they have wronged Job in the way they have responded. They have condemned Job unjustly and they have not honored God.
Now let’s come back to what Elihu has to say about Job at the end of verse 2. The statement in verse 1, that Job was righteous in his own eyes, comes from the author of the book of Job. The accusation of verse 2 comes from Elihu. And what is that accusation? Let’s read it: “His wrath was aroused because he justified himself rather than God.” That is, “The wrath of Elihu was aroused because Job justified himself.” After listening to all of Job’s reasoning and defenses, Elihu accuses Job of justifying himself rather than justifying God.
So what does that mean? How would you define “justifying self”? To justify yourself is to claim that you are right. At first, we might say, “But Job was right.” Yes, he was right in that he had not done that of which his friends accused him. He was even right in refusing to say he had done those things. Yes, he had maintained his integrity in that way. But when we read the rest of Elihu’s accusation, it puts a new light on things. “He justified himself rather than God.” Job was more interested in declaring himself right than declaring God right.
Wouldn’t we have to agree that Elihu’s accusation is right on target? Let’s go back and read again Job 19:6-12…
Know then that God has wronged me, And has surrounded me with His net. 7 "If I cry out concerning wrong, I am not heard. If I cry aloud, there is no justice. 8 He has fenced up my way, so that I cannot pass; And He has set darkness in my paths. 9 He has stripped me of my glory, And taken the crown from my head. 10 He breaks me down on every side, And I am gone; My hope He has uprooted like a tree. 11 He has also kindled His wrath against me, And He counts me as one of His enemies. 12 His troops come together And build up their road against me; They encamp all around my tent.
Is this not an example of Job justifying himself rather than God? Or consider what we read just last week in Job 27:2, “As God lives, who has taken away my justice, and the Almighty, who has made my soul bitter…” Is Job not justifying himself rather than God? Rather than taking personal responsibility for his own bitterness, he accuses the Lord of making him bitter. By denying him justice God had brought him bitterness. That’s Job’s viewpoint.
If Job had continued in this same direction, he would have ended up where the Pharisees were. Listen to what Jesus said to the Pharisees in Luke 16:15, “And He said to them, ‘You are those who justify yourselves before men, but God knows your hearts. For what is highly esteemed among men is an abomination in the sight of God.’” The Pharisees were guilty of justifying themselves. Although we don’t read the words, “rather than God,” the concept is in the context. Just go back to verse 14, “Now the Pharisees, who were lovers of money, also heard all these things, and they derided [ridiculed -- ESV; scoffed at -- NLT] Him.” While they justified themselves, they mocked the Son of God. When Jesus tried to warn them that they could not serve two masters, they scoffed at Him and justified themselves. Because of the grace of God, Job didn’t end up where the Pharisees did, but at this point he was on dangerous ground, if indeed Elihu is right in his assessment of Job.
So here we have a preview of where Elihu is coming from. After witnessing this heated debate between Job and his friends, Elihu confidently declares that there has been no winner. Both Job and his friends are in the wrong. So now comes the logical question: “Who is Elihu to make such a judgment?” In the rest of chapter 32 and the first seven verses of chapter 33 Elihu will introduce himself.
III. Elihu’s Self-Introduction
Elihu must have sensed a need to explain to Job and his friends why he thought he had the right to speak. It is that explanation that we now want to read. So let’s go back to the start of chapter 32, as we seek to understand who Elihu is. Read Job 32:1-33:7…
1 So these three men ceased answering Job, because he was righteous in his own eyes. 2 Then the wrath of Elihu, the son of Barachel the Buzite, of the family of Ram, was aroused against Job; his wrath was aroused because he justified himself rather than God. 3 Also against his three friends his wrath was aroused, because they had found no answer, and yet had condemned Job.4 Now because they were years older than he, Elihu had waited to speak to Job. 5 When Elihu saw that there was no answer in the mouth of these three men, his wrath was aroused. 6 So Elihu, the son of Barachel the Buzite, answered and said: "I am young in years, and you are very old; Therefore I was afraid, And dared not declare my opinion to you. 7 I said, 'Age should speak, And multitude of years should teach wisdom.' 8 But there is a spirit in man, And the breath of the Almighty gives him understanding. 9 Great men are not always wise, Nor do the aged always understand justice. 10 "Therefore I say, 'Listen to me, I also will declare my opinion.' 11 Indeed I waited for your words, I listened to your reasonings, while you searched out what to say. 12 I paid close attention to you; And surely not one of you convinced Job, Or answered his words-- 13 Lest you say, 'We have found wisdom'; God will vanquish him, not man. 14 Now he has not directed his words against me; So I will not answer him with your words. 15 "They are dismayed and answer no more; Words escape them. 16 And I have waited, because they did not speak, Because they stood still and answered no more. 17 I also will answer my part, I too will declare my opinion. 18For I am full of words; The spirit within me compels me. 19 Indeed my belly is like wine that has no vent; It is ready to burst like new wineskins. 20 I will speak, that I may find relief; I must open my lips and answer. 21 Let me not, I pray, show partiality to anyone; Nor let me flatter any man. 22For I do not know how to flatter, Else my Maker would soon take me away.
1 "But please, Job, hear my speech, And listen to all my words. 2 Now, I open my mouth; My tongue speaks in my mouth. 3 My words come from my upright heart; My lips utter pure knowledge. 4 The Spirit of God has made me, And the breath of the Almighty gives me life. 5 If you can answer me, Set your words in order before me; Take your stand. 6 Truly I am as your spokesman before God; I also have been formed out of clay. 7 Surely no fear of me will terrify you, Nor will my hand be heavy on you.
Allow me to give you a little outline of 32:6 - 33:7…
A. Why me and why now? (32:6-9)
Elihu explained why he had not spoken up to this time. He was afraid to declare his opinion, because he was younger than the rest of them. He rightly assessed that the older ones should speak first, because it is assumed that they will have more wisdom. In general, that is a correct assumption, but not always. As Elihu puts it in verse 9, “Great men are not always wise, nor do the aged always understand justice [what is right -- ESV].”
Let me be clear at this point. The scriptures teach that it is right and proper to respect age. Listen to Prov. 1:8-9, “My son, hear the instruction of your father, And do not forsake the law of your mother; For they will be a graceful ornament on your head, And chains about your neck.” Why does the Lord say this? Because parents generally have more wisdom than their children. That is true simply because they have lived longer and have experienced things through which they have learned. A practical example of the wisdom that comes through age is the foolishness of Rehoboam. When faced with a crucial decision concerning how he would treat the people of Israel, if they were to be under his rule as king, he sought out the advice of his friends and the advice of the older men who were his dad’s age. He chose to follow the advice of the younger men, and it cost him the loss of most of the kingdom. There is wisdom with age. Nevertheless, this is not a hard-and-fast rule that doesn’t have exceptions. That is what Elihu is saying. While it is true that “age should speak and multitude of years should teach wisdom…, great men [older men] are not always wise.” We have an example in the words of the Psalmist: “I have more understanding than all my teachers, For Your testimonies are my meditation. I understand more than the ancients, Because I keep Your precepts” (Ps. 119:99-100).
B. Now a word of introduction to Eliphaz, Bildad, and Zophar (10-14)
When we begin reading in verse 10, it soon becomes clear that Elihu is speaking to Job’s three friends, declaring that they should get ready to his opinion. He emphasizes the fact that he has carefully listened to their arguments. Because he is young, he has patiently waited for his turn. It’s not like Elihu suddenly walked up, heard the last words of the debate, and has blurted out his opinion. No, he has done his homework, carefully weighing the words of these older men. But after careful observation, he has come to the conclusion which he states for them: “Surely not one of you convinced Job or answered his words.” This is an expansion of what he said in verses 3 and 5. It was this lack of an answer to Job that stirred him up in the first place.
Elihu feels compelled to speak lest Job’s friends should say, “We found wisdom; God will vanquish him, not man” (13). The NKJV ends the quotation after “wisdom,” while the ESV, NIV, and others end it after “man.” I believe Elihu is putting all these words into their mouth. In other words, “Beware that you think you have found wisdom when you say that God will refute him, not man.” Elihu believes they have failed in their responsibility to find an adequate answer for Job.
With that in mind, he concludes his words to Job’s friends by saying that he will not answer Job with their words. He believes that these men have missed important truths that need to be spoken to Job, and now Elihu intends to bring forth those neglected truths.
C. Now a word to Job (32:15-20)
We detect a change in audience when we come to verse 15, because now Elihu says “They are dismayed and answer no more.” This is clearly a reference to Job’s friends. They have nothing more to say. Elihu then reminds Job that he has patiently waited for them to finish speaking. He did not interrupt them. Now he longs for Job to allow him to speak, even as he has allowed the other three to do.
After stating that he too will declare his opinion, Elihu then gets a bit excited. Though he is still polite, he states with great conviction: “For I am full of words; the spirit within me compels me. Indeed my belly is like wine that has no vent; it is ready to burst like new wineskins. I will speak, that I may find relief; I must open my lips and answer” (19-20). Animal skins were used as a kind of bottle. When wine was put in the skin and it was completely sealed, the fermenting wine began to put pressure on the skin. If not vent was provided, the skin would finally explode. In the same way, Elihu is saying that he just can’t hold it in any longer. It reminds me of the prophet Jeremiah: “Then I said, ‘I will not make mention of Him, Nor speak anymore in His name.’ But His word was in my heart like a burning fire Shut up in my bones; I was weary of holding it back, And I could not” (Jer. 20:9).
D. And now a word to one and all (32:21-22)
Now Elihu assures Job and his friends that he will not show partiality in any way. He will not favor Eliphaz, Bildad, and Zophar because Job has justified himself rather than God. Neither will he favor Job because his friends have failed to give him an adequate answer. Elihu is declaring that he will not be swayed by their opinion of him.
Not only does he say he will not be partial, but he also states that he will not flatter any of them. He knows nothing of that practice. After all, if he were to do so, he would then be in trouble with the Lord Himself.
E. A special appeal to Job (33:1-7)
Though Job’s friends will likely hang around and hear all that Elihu has to say, his primary audience is Job. So Elihu now addresses Job by name and invites him to listen carefully to what he has to say. He mentions several things about what he is going to say. His words will come from an upright heart. He also says that his lips will utter pure knowledge. That is, he will speak from the sincerity of his heart. He has no ulterior motives. And notice the words, “The Spirit of God has made me, and the breath of the Almighty gives me life.” Elihu is claiming that the truth he is going to proclaim is rooted in God the Almighty. He believes the Lord Himself is going to speak through him. Elihu also gives Job the privilege of responding. “If you can answer me, set your words in order before me. Take your stand” (5).
Finally, Elihu assures Job that he is speaking to him as a friend, reminding Job that he also is made of clay. In the NKJV begins: “Truly I am as your spokesman before God.” The KJV is difficult to get hold of: “Behold, I am according to thy wish in God’s stead.” The ESV reads, “Behold, I am toward God as you are.” NIV, “I am just like you before God.” I’m not sure where the NKJV gets the idea of “spokesman.” At any rate, verse 7 gives the implication: “Surely no fear of me will terrify you, nor will my hand be heavy on you.” It is not his purpose to crush Job.
So we see that Elihu goes to some length to introduce himself and state his purpose in speaking to Job and his friends (primarily to Job).
Conclusion
This morning let’s close by applying that searching statement Elihu made about Job -- “He justified himself rather than God.” Are we ever tempted to do that? Can you give me a possible example? [Give time]
Let’s suppose one of you ladies befriends a younger lady who has gone the way of the world. When you first met this Sheila, she was a mess, but God convicted you that you needed to love her. You did. Gradually, over the weeks that followed, she began to tell you her story. When you first mentioned the Bible to her, she was very resistant. She made it clear that she wanted nothing to do with the Bible or the God of the Bible. But you just continued to care about her and work with her. Over time, you were able to share the gospel with her and help her to understand who God is and why He sent His Son. She listened to you and seemed to be grasping some of the truth. Up to this point, she was not willing to go with you to a church service.
One Sunday morning you showed up a bit late for the Sunday morning service, because of a minor emergency with one of your kids or grandkids. You quietly slipped into your seat and listened to the sermon. At the end of his message, the pastor said something like this: “I want to introduce you to a young lady. Brandi met her this week, shared the gospel with her, and she has put her trust in the Lord Jesus Christ.” At that point Brandi, another lady from your church, steps up to the front along with this young lady. Suddenly you recognize her; it’s Sheila, the girl you have been working with for months.
Will you rejoice? Why wouldn’t you rejoice? But not one word is said about how you have been working with Sheila all this time. The pastor doesn’t even mention your name. No one knows the hours you have spent sharing the Word with Sheila, the phone calls you have answered at all hours of the night. You’re glad that Brandi shared the gospel with her, but shouldn’t people know that you were the one who laid the foundation? You are facing a simple question: Will you justify yourself or God? Will you complain that it isn’t fair? Or will you praise God that he is working in your friend?
What about adversity and trials? Will you praise God that in His great wisdom He is making you like Jesus? Or will you harbor resentment because you are having to bear such a heavy load?
Why should we always justify God? Because God always does what is right, both in the world as a whole and in our lives as individuals. He has never made a mistake. His very nature is righteousness. God created you. When He finished His original creation, climaxed with the formation of man, God said it was very good. When you rebelled against your Creator, He didn’t destroy you. He was merciful. Instead of pouring out His wrath on you, God poured out that wrath upon His own Son. The Lord God patiently drew you to Himself. Yes, He saved you. Now He is making you like Jesus. On top of all that, He has promised to never leave you nor forsake you. How can we do anything but justify Him who is absolutely just.
This week let’s be aware of our attitude. As you go through your daily experiences, ask the simple question: “Am I justifying myself? Or, am I justifying God?” But how do I know if I am justifying God? Let me put it simply: To justify God is to praise God. If God is right in what He is doing, then He deserves to be praised for it.
Please continue to read chapters 32-37, which contain the words of Elihu. As you do, you will have to form some opinion about Elihu. Is he an arrogant brat? Or is he a young man who speaks with wisdom?