Sunday, November 28, 1010
NEW NAME, BUT SAME MESSAGE
This morning I am going to do something very different. I’m not one to beat around the bush, so let me come straight to the point. I want to talk to you about some changes that we are making. Change is something that we do not like. You may say, “I don’t mind change.” I suggest that while you may like some change, a thorough investigation of your life would reveal a resistance to many types of change. There is something safe and secure about keeping things pretty much the way they are. That is why habits and traditions can become such powerful things. Tradition is basically no more than habit on a group level.
You have probably heard the story of the woman who always cut off the ends of the ham before she cooked it, but let me remind you. One day her daughter asked her why she did it. This lady couldn’t give an answer. She honestly didn’t know the reason, except that her own mother had always cut off the ends of the ham before cooking it. Her daughter’s question made an impression on her, so when she got a chance, she asked her mother, “Mom, when we were growing up, you always cut off the ends of the ham before you cooked it, but I never knew why. Why did you do that?” Her mom was a bit puzzled, just assuming that her daughter would have known why she did it. Then she answered very simply, “Because it was too big for the pan.” It had simply become an unquestioned habit. The necessity was no longer there, but her daughter had continued to do so because she was so comfortable with doing things the way they had always been done.
Let me remind you of how difficult change is when it comes to spiritual things. We see it in the way people responded to Jesus Himself. Who was Jesus? He was God in the flesh. He was the Word who revealed the Father more clearly than any written word could ever do (see Heb. 1:1-3). He was the Messiah, the God-anointed one for whom the Jews had been waiting for hundreds of years. That being true, how was it that those who best knew the Word of God opposed Him so strongly? How could it be that the most highly-respected Jewish leaders of that day engineered His death, rather than falling at His feet? Much of it had to do with their resistance to change.
Jesus came as their Messiah, but He wasn’t what they were expecting. They were expecting a Messiah who would come and use His power to make all things right. They saw the coming Messiah as one who would certainly overthrow Roman rule and re-establish the kingdom of Israel. Surely God was not glorified by His chosen people being under the control of pagans. They longed for their Messiah to come and turn things upside down
This was their expectation, and there was good reason for their line of thinking. Consider a passage we know very well, Isaiah 9:6-7…
For unto us a child is born, unto us a son is given: and the government shall be upon his shoulder: and his name shall be called Wonderful, Counsellor, The mighty God, The everlasting Father, The Prince of Peace. 7. Of the increase of his government and peace there shall be no end, upon the throne of David, and upon his kingdom, to order it, and to establish it with judgment and with justice from henceforth even for ever. The zeal of the LORD of hosts will perform this.
Wow! The child to be born would be the Mighty God, who would sit upon the throne of David. Or consider Psalm 2…
Why do the heathen rage, and the people imagine a vain thing? 2. The kings of the earth set themselves, and the rulers take counsel together, against the LORD, and against his anointed, saying, 3. Let us break their bands asunder, and cast away their cords from us. 4. He that sitteth in the heavens shall laugh: the Lord shall have them in derision. 5. Then shall he speak unto them in his wrath, and vex them in his sore displeasure. 6. Yet have I set my king upon my holy hill of Zion. 7. I will declare the decree: the LORD hath said unto me, Thou art my Son; this day have I begotten thee. 8. Ask of me, and I shall give thee the heathen for thine inheritance, and the uttermost parts of the earth for thy possession. 9. Thou shalt break them with a rod of iron; thou shalt dash them in pieces like a potter's vessel. 10. Be wise now therefore, O ye kings: be instructed, ye judges of the earth. 11. Serve the LORD with fear, and rejoice with trembling. 12. Kiss the Son, lest he be angry, and ye perish from the way, when his wrath is kindled but a little. Blessed are all they that put their trust in him.
The LORD, Jehovah Himself, God the Father, refers to His Son as the King, who will rule the nations with a rod of iron. Is it any wonder these Jewish leaders who were skilled in knowledge of the scripture were expecting their Messiah to come with a great display of power and royalty? With those kind of expectations, what were they supposed to think of one of whom it was said, “And she brought forth her firstborn son, and wrapped him in swaddling clothes, and laid him in a manger (feed trough), because there was no room for him in the inn” (Luke 2:7)? When they began to hear rumors of Jesus being the Messiah, what were they supposed to do with the other rumors about His scandalous birth? Beyond the birth, how could God’s Messiah be the son of a nobody named Joseph and have grown up in a hick town called Nazareth?
Are you getting the point? For them to see Jesus for who He really was, a tremendous change in their thinking would be required. It wasn’t that they were reading the wrong book. All the prophecies they had read about the Messiah were true; the problem was that they were not interpreting them properly. And their confusion was certainly understandable. We would have been confused too. The great question was this: Would they be sufficiently open to change that Jesus would be able to correct them? For the most part, they were not. With a few exceptions, the Jewish leaders concluded that Jesus performed His miracles by Beelzebub, the prince of the demons (Matt. 12:24). Jesus taught the truth of God; He lived the life of God, but those Jewish leaders refused to abandon their way of thinking. Their minds were set, and they refused to change.
We see the same thing in the way the Jewish people responded to a fellow-Jew named Paul. He was formerly Saul of Tarsus, a leading Pharisee among the Jews. Like the rest of the Pharisees, he was resistant to change, but out of His tender mercy, God dealt with Saul with a strong hand, striking him down with a blinding light. After Saul was converted, he became the man we know as the apostle Paul. As zealous as he was in opposing Jesus, with the same kind of zeal he now proclaimed Jesus as the true Messiah. Whenever he entered a city, the first thing he did was to go to the synagogue and reason with the Jews from the scriptures, demonstrating that Jesus was indeed the Messiah God had promised. Now you would think that Paul’s testimony of conversion and his Spirit-taught command of the scriptures would be absolutely convincing. For some it was, but many others rejected his words. The views they held concerning the Messiah were so entrenched that they refused to change. They were so sure of themselves that they opposed Paul in every way possible. The Jews from Antioch and Iconium actually followed Paul to Lystra and so poisoned the minds of the people there against Paul that they stoned him and left him for dead (Acts 14:19). I would have to say that they were resistant to change, even in the face of God-given truth.
But what about Paul himself? Wasn’t he well entrenched in his convictions and resistant to change? After the Lord saved Paul, He enabled the apostle to be a man who was willing to change. Paul was jealous for the Lord’s glory and zealous to see others come to know Him. Now let’s read about his flexibility in I Cor. 9:19-23…
For though I be free from all men, yet have I made myself servant unto all, that I might gain the more. 20. And unto the Jews I became as a Jew, that I might gain the Jews; to them that are under the law, as under the law, that I might gain them that are under the law; 21. To them that are without law, as without law, (being not without law to God, but under the law to Christ,) that I might gain them that are without law. 22. To the weak became I as weak, that I might gain the weak: I am made all things to all men, that I might by all means save some. 23. And this I do for the gospel's sake, that I might be partaker thereof with you.
Paul was always willing to change, when it meant influencing people for Christ and bringing Him glory.
Jesus spoke of this principle when He gave us the little parable about the new garment and the new bottles, or new wineskins. Luke 5:36-38…
And he spake also a parable unto them; No man putteth a piece of a new garment upon an old; if otherwise, then both the new maketh a rent, and the piece that was taken out of the new agreeth not with the old. 37. And no man putteth new wine into old bottles; else the new wine will burst the bottles, and be spilled, and the bottles shall perish. 38. But new wine must be put into new bottles; and both are preserved.
Just consider what Jesus said about the necessity of putting new wine into new bottles (wineskins). What is He trying to say? Jesus told this parable in response to their questions about fasting. He wasn’t saying that His followers shouldn’t fast, but He was saying that fasting under the new covenant was not the same as fasting under the old covenant. There was a fundamental change. There were other things that changed when Jesus fulfilled the law and the prophets. A few weeks ago some of us heard David Platt talk about one of those fundamental changes. While material wealth was a sign of God’s blessing under the old covenant, that is not necessarily so under the new covenant. As seen in the instance of the rich young ruler, riches can be a barrier rather than a blessing. But that is a change that was and is hard for many to accept.
Now let’s come back to the changes that we are making. You may already be thinking, no changes we are making are along the same lines as the changes between the old covenant and the new. You are absolutely right. We certainly do not have the authority to make the kind of changes that Jesus did. On the other hand, because any changes we will make are not nearly so significant, they should be easier to receive. Ultimately, all changes must be tested by the Word of God.
With that in mind, we (the pastor/elders of this church) believe that the changes we are making are in line with scriptural principles and will ultimately prove to be to the glory of God. We certainly do not find that they violate God’s Word in any way. Remember what Paul said in 2 Tim. 3:16-17, "All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness: 17. That the man of God may be perfect, thoroughly furnished unto all good works." We are trusting that the Holy Spirit is guiding us through the Word that has been given us.
We have come to the decision that it is wise for us to withdraw from the Southern Baptist Convention. As most of you know, this is not a new issue. It has come up again and again over the last 25 years. We believe that this is really only a formality, as we have been Southern Baptist in name only for many years.
The biggest change came 25 years ago, when we made the decision to pursue being the unique church God wanted us to be (though not stated in those terms at the time). There were issues at that time…
1. Elders. In looking into the Word of God, we had some serious questions about the wisdom of the one-pastor system. We were coming to believe that the scriptures teach us that the church is to be led by a plurality (more than one) of elders/pastors/overseers. I was told by the leaders of our Southern Baptist association that “Baptists don’t do that.” I asked those leaders very specifically to simply show us in the scriptures where we should not have a plurality of elders. The answer I received was, “Baptists don’t do that.” Their statement was not true. While no Baptists around us were doing that, there were some in the nation who were and there were many in the past who had done so. They never offered any biblical support for their position.
2. Other issues. Example: Someone said something like this to me, “I read in the Bible about lifting of the hands to the Lord. Can we do that?” I responded with the answer from scripture, but that was not popular. There were those in the church who wanted me to say, “It may be biblical, but if you want to do that, you have to go to another church. Baptists don’t do that.”
It was at that time that we made the decision to let the Word of God be our guide, rather than those who held to Baptist traditions above that Word. As a result, most of those who were strong on being Southern Baptist filtered out to other churches. Though we have remained a part of the Southern Baptist Convention and the Mountain Valley Baptist Association for these 25 years, we have increasingly moved in a different direction. It isn’t just that we oppose some practices that are common among Southern Baptists (though we do), but even moreso we simply do not see this as a Southern Baptist church. We don’t attend Southern Baptist meetings; we don’t use Southern Baptist literature; we as leaders do not use the term “Baptist” to describe ourselves.
Through the earlier part of these 25 years, I (and sometimes others) would attend denominational meetings, but such attendance has decreased until now we do not. It isn’t because the meetings are necessarily bad, but simply because we don’t sense the Lord would have us spend our time and energy in that direction.
Concerning Southern Baptist practices which we oppose, one specific example is the use of the Camel method by the SB International Mission Board. This method is used to evangelize Muslims. The missionary becomes familiar with the Koran and uses it as a starting point, emphasizing the parts that talk about Jesus. Even if we could become comfortable with that, we cannot tolerate the message that follows. There is no clear distinction between Allah and the true and living God, leaving serious questions about whether Muslims and Christians worship the same God. In addition, there are instances where Muslims are told they can follow Christ and continue to go to the mosque. Some of us looked into the Camel method pretty thoroughly and then wrote a letter to the International Mission Board. They responded with a form letter that has been sent to many who have voiced concerns about this mission strategy. Basically, the IMB does not endorse the method outright, but neither do they discontinue its use. We believe it is a missionary strategy that will deceive Muslims into thinking they are right with God when they are not.
It was because of this concern that we discontinued our $200 monthly support of the Southern Baptist Cooperative Program two years ago. Technically, a church which does not give anything to the Cooperative Program over a 12-month period cannot be a part of the New Mexico Baptist Convention, and thus not a part of the SBC.
Perhaps our other great concern is the way the gospel is proclaimed by Southern Baptists in our day. We are well aware that the good news can be shared in a wide variety of ways. However, we have grave concerns about a message that doesn’t always emphasize repentance from sin. We believe that the idea that you can receive Jesus as Savior and not as Lord is both false and dangerous. Does every Southern Baptist church proclaim such a message? No, but many do. We don’t want to be associated with such a message.
Bottom line, people who come here because they want to be a part of a Southern Baptist church will be disappointed, because we don’t fit the bill. Our sign says we are Southern Baptist, but in reality we are not. Therefore, we have made the decision that we are going to withdraw from our Southern Baptist associations. We will not be a part of Southern Baptists on a national, state, or associational level. That will mean a discontinuing of the $200 we send the Mountain Valley Baptist Association each month. We believe that money can be better spent in other mission endeavors.
Now let me be very clear at this point. We are not saying that there are no good, solid, Christ-honoring Southern Baptist churches. There are, and we know of some who are faithfully serving the Lord. Nor does this decision mean that we don’t want to have fellowship with Southern Baptist churches and individuals who are a part of Southern Baptist churches. In short, we want to have fellowship with the people of God. Lord willing, we will continue to have fellowship with Gethsemane and New Life, which are Southern Baptist churches. We will also continue fellowshipping with Cornerstone and Grace, which are not Southern Baptist churches. As in the past, such fellowship will not be along denominational lines, but will be centered in sharing the life of Christ.
This decision leads us to another issue. Because we were incorporated as a non-profit, tax-exempt organization under the umbrella of New Mexico Baptists, we must now incorporate on our own. Here is the question: “Do we do so as ‘First Baptist Church’ (currently our official name)? Or do we do so under another name? Bottom line, do we retain ‘Baptist’ in our name? We will no longer be Southern Baptist, but do we want to remain a Baptist church? In other words, do we want to be an independent Baptist church or a non-denominational church?
We discussed this issue at a Member’s Meeting two and a half weeks ago. A couple of concerns have been voiced. First of all, there is the concern that if we drop the name “Baptist,” outsiders will not know what we are about. When they see that we are a Baptist church, they will have some idea about what we believe and what we practice. They won’t mistake us for some cult. I must say that this is a valid concern. About twenty years ago our family was on vacation in Colorado. Sunday morning we attended services at a small Southern Baptist Church, and Rhonda ended up playing the piano. That evening we decided to find a church in the phone book and attend its service. We went to some church that had the name “Lighthouse” in it. Yes, surely the Lord wants a church to be a lighthouse to the world. To make a long story short, I either had to stand up and say something or we had to leave. My precious wife thought wisdom would dictate that we should quietly make our exit, and we did. I would have to say that it was a type of cult, built around worship of the pastor. The name didn’t tell us that.
However, I want to suggest to you that the name “Baptist” may not communicate what we expect. Most people (especially non-Christians) do not know what Baptists believe. It is far more likely that they will associate particular practices and traditions with the name “Baptist.”
The other concern comes along this line: “Through the years, Baptists have been true to the Word of God. Despite errors and abuses, over all Baptists have tenaciously claimed, ‘We are a people of the book.’ Do we not want to continue in that mold? Is there not a rich heritage among Baptists? Can’t we point to some Baptist heroes in the past? Will not the name ‘Baptist’ identify us with the Word of God?” Again, I would have to say that this is a very valid point. My question is this: “Can we not be just as true to the Word of God without the name ‘Baptist’?” Over these past 25 years, it is not our Baptist name and heritage that has molded our convictions, but the Word of God itself. But doesn’t a sense of history aid us in our interpretation of the Word of God? Absolutely. However, I must point out that while we can appreciate Baptists who have stuck with the Word of God, there are many non-Baptists who have just as tenaciously taken their stand on that book. In February Norman and I went to a conference at Grace Community Church in California. Did it bother us or anyone in this church that we attended a conference at a church that was not Baptist? Not at all. Why not? Because that church and its pastor have a history of lifting up Jesus and ordering life according to the scriptures.
As the pastor/elders of this church, our basic questions are these…
1. Does “Baptist” accurately reflect who we are? We don’t talk about being Baptist. We don’t follow Baptist programs or trends. In the final analysis, we are Baptist only in name.
2. We don’t want to spend our time and energy teaching new converts what it means to be Baptist. It will take all of our Spirit-directed efforts to teach them about the Lord and how to live by His Word. It is rather awkward having people become a part of a Baptist church and have them know little or nothing about why we are Baptist.
3. We are absolutely convinced that over the long haul we will be able to more effectively reach the lost without “Baptist” being attached to our name. While we welcome Christians who come here in search of a church home, we sense an even greater responsibility to proclaim the good news to the lost people around us. We don’t see any advantage in adding anything to Christ.
4. We have some questions about denominationalism as a whole. We read these words in I Cor. 3:1-7..
And I, brethren, could not speak unto you as unto spiritual, but as unto carnal, even as unto babes in Christ. 2. I have fed you with milk, and not with meat: for hitherto ye were not able to bear it, neither yet now are ye able. 3. For ye are yet carnal: for whereas there is among you envying, and strife, and divisions, are ye not carnal, and walk as men? 4. For while one saith, I am of Paul; and another, I am of Apollos; are ye not carnal? 5. Who then is Paul, and who is Apollos, but ministers by whom ye believed, even as the Lord gave to every man? 6. I have planted, Apollos watered; but God gave the increase. 7. So then neither is he that planteth any thing, neither he that watereth; but God that giveth the increase.
While these divisions are not perfectly parallel to Christians dividing into denominations, theremay be some application. There are those who strongly teach that this passage declares denominations to be a direct violation of God’s Word, based on this passage. While we can’t say with absolute conviction that contention is true, neither can we say that it is not. We realize thatwe cannot fix all the problems of division, but we don’t want to contribute to the problem unnecessarily.
As I have shared with some of the rest of you, when Norman, Alex, or I invite someone to come to our services, we don’t invite him or her to First Baptist Church or La Luz Baptist Church. Rather, we just refer to us as “the church in La Luz.” A number of you do the same thing. It seems pretty strange to go by a name that many in the church, including the pastor/elders, are reluctant to use.
On the one hand, we don’t see this as a huge issue for us. We believe that these decisions were made years ago. Now we are simply recognizing those decisions and acting accordingly. We believe that withdrawing from the Southern Baptist Convention and dropping the name “Baptist” will more accurately define who we are and where God has led us through the years. For those reasons, we will no longer be a Baptist church.
One brother who has been a part of Baptist churches all of his life is willing to follow the direction of the Lord for the church but maintains, “I am still a Baptist.” We have no problem with that. We deeply appreciate his willingness and your willingness to be open to change, change which we believe will ultimately bring glory to our Lord.
Obviously, we will need a name. Some have been suggested, but we are open to any and all suggestions. Among those suggestions, here are four that have been made…
1. La Luz Bible Church
2. La Luz Community Church
3. La Luz Christian Fellowship Church
4. La Luz Church
Please give us feedback on these names and/or make other suggestions. Let’s pray that the Lord will lead us to the name that is appropriate for us and will bring glory to Him. Lord willing, we will have a Member’s Meeting this Wednesday evening. At that meeting, the elders will have chosen two names and the members will choose one of those names. Two weeks later we will amend our constitution and by-laws to reflect that change.
Now let me be very clear. We will have a new name, but we will proclaim the same message. We will continue to preach the same gospel. Almighty God, who is perfectly righteous and holy, created us and deserves everything we are and everything we have. But we have not given Him ourselves. “All we like sheep have gone astray; we have turned everyone to his own way” (Is. 53:6). Being sinners from the time we were born, we have rebelled against our faithful Creator. Furthermore, there is not a thing we can do to fix ourselves. No amount of good deeds or Bible reading or church going or prayer can make us right with God. As the Lord says in Isaiah 59:2, “Your iniquities have separated between you and your God.” As a day of work earns a wage, so our sins have earned us the wage of death -- not just physical death, but eternal separation from God.
Can anything be done about our hopeless situation? Is there any hope that our sins which have separated us from God can be overlooked? No, not a single sin will ever be overlooked by a holy God. Sin must be punished; the debt must be paid. “But God commendeth his love toward us, in that while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us” (Rom. 5:8). 1 John 4:9-10, "In this was manifested the love of God toward us, because that God sent his only begotten Son into the world, that we might live through him. 10. Herein is love, not that we loved God, but that he loved us, and sent his Son to be the propitiation for our sins." That simply means that Jesus became our substitute. When He died on the cross, He took on Himself the wrath of God, all the punishment that should have fallen upon us. God doesn’t overlook sin; He punished our sins in Christ. “God was in Christ, reconciling the world to himself, not imputing their trespasses unto them” (II Cor. 5:19).
So what does a person do with that good news. Fall at the Lord’s feet. Repent and believe. Give up on yourself completely and throw yourself on the Jesus who died in your place.
That’s the gospel. May God give us grace to live and proclaim that gospel every day. A change in name will not make us do that more effectively. But praise God that He is working a change in us, gradually but increasingly making us like His Son, that He might be the firstfruits among many brethren. Read it with me in Rom. 8:28-29, "And we know that all things work together for good to them that love God, to them who are the called according to his purpose. 29. For whom he did foreknow, he also did predestinate to be conformed to the image of his Son, that he might be the firstborn among many brethren." God is working in His children to make us like Jesus. But why? So that Jesus might be the firstborn among many brothers (and sisters). Jesus rose from the dead to go and sit at the right hand of the Father for all eternity, but that isn’t the end of the story. Remember His words spoken on that last night on earth, “Because I live, you shall live also” (John 14:19). He is making us like Jesus so that those around us may see our good works and glorify our Father which is in heaven, so that others will come to share in His life.
May nothing sidetrack us from our work of making disciples for the glory of God. We are weak, but He is strong. In these earthen vessels, these clay pots, we have the treasure, which is none other than the glory of God in the face of Jesus Christ. Why? That the excellency, the surpassing greatness, may be of God and not of us (see II Cor. 4:6-7).